The
Senate has rejected legislation that would have given local towns more clout in
the state review of energy projects that are proposed for their communities. Instead, lawmakers backed an
effort that calls for a statewide study of the impact of the projects in the
future.
The
Vermont House is preparing to debate the budget and a number of new tax
proposals this week, and House leaders are already trying to line up votes for
a $1.3 billion plan that includes a contentious bid to cap welfare benefits.
For
the first time this legislative session, the full Vermont Senate will debate
renewable energy on Tuesday. In Montpelier, though, some lawmakers’ hopes of passing meaningful
climate change legislation that might reduce greenhouse gas emissions have already
collided with the state’s fiscal reality.
A key House committee has given preliminary approval to a tax package
that would raise roughly $26 million, putting it on a collision course
with the governor because it includes provisions he opposes.
VPR’s John Dillon looks at two energy stories: the legislative debate
over S.30, a bill that would give towns the ability to veto a wind
energy project, and the ongoing regulatory oversight of the Vermont
Yankee nuclear power plant, which has now been operating without state
permission for one year.
Senate
President John Campbell says he supports a bill that would subject renewable
energy projects to review under the Act 250 environmental control law.
After
weeks of studying Vermont’s prescription drug problem, House lawmakers on
Thursday advanced a sweeping bill that would address opiate addiction and
abuse.
Governor
Peter Shumlin has signed a bill that allows a judge to take away a public
employee’s pension if the worker is guilty of a financial crime relating to the
public office.